<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marketing on Google+ Part 1: 8 Ways to Drive Traffic to Your Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.networksolutions.com/smallbusiness/2012/04/marketing-on-google-part-1-8-ways-to-drive-traffic-to-your-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.networksolutions.com/smallbusiness/2012/04/marketing-on-google-part-1-8-ways-to-drive-traffic-to-your-site/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 12:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pradeep prajapati</title>
		<link>http://www.networksolutions.com/smallbusiness/2012/04/marketing-on-google-part-1-8-ways-to-drive-traffic-to-your-site/#comment-42216</link>
		<dc:creator>pradeep prajapati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networksolutions.com/smallbusiness/?p=12710#comment-42216</guid>
		<description>As I am sure you know, each social network is a little bit different, and because a lot of people don&#039;t use Google+, this blog post was simply meant as a guide to help people understand it better.  If your target market is using Google+, you should be on it too, so yes, focusing your marketing there may be more effective than LinkedIn, for example.  Great comments, so thanks for sharing!  











</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I am sure you know, each social network is a little bit different, and because a lot of people don&#8217;t use Google+, this blog post was simply meant as a guide to help people understand it better.  If your target market is using Google+, you should be on it too, so yes, focusing your marketing there may be more effective than LinkedIn, for example.  Great comments, so thanks for sharing!  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.networksolutions.com/smallbusiness/2012/04/marketing-on-google-part-1-8-ways-to-drive-traffic-to-your-site/#comment-41665</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networksolutions.com/smallbusiness/?p=12710#comment-41665</guid>
		<description>As I am sure you know, each social network is a little bit different, and because a lot of people don&#039;t use Google+, this blog post was simply meant as a guide to help people understand it better.  If your target market is using Google+, you should be on it too, so yes, focusing your marketing there may be more effective than LinkedIn, for example.  Great comments, so thanks for sharing!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I am sure you know, each social network is a little bit different, and because a lot of people don&#8217;t use Google+, this blog post was simply meant as a guide to help people understand it better.  If your target market is using Google+, you should be on it too, so yes, focusing your marketing there may be more effective than LinkedIn, for example.  Great comments, so thanks for sharing! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZeusofMarketing</title>
		<link>http://www.networksolutions.com/smallbusiness/2012/04/marketing-on-google-part-1-8-ways-to-drive-traffic-to-your-site/#comment-41655</link>
		<dc:creator>ZeusofMarketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networksolutions.com/smallbusiness/?p=12710#comment-41655</guid>
		<description>How&#039;s is this different or any more effective than executing the same tactics via Linked In , Facebook and Twitter (even Pinterest)? You are telling me that Google will actually penalize a company for not participating in an unproven Social Media network. Last I heard the average time spent in Google+ is 33 seconds - and daily active user has not even been fully disclosed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How&#8217;s is this different or any more effective than executing the same tactics via Linked In , Facebook and Twitter (even Pinterest)? You are telling me that Google will actually penalize a company for not participating in an unproven Social Media network. Last I heard the average time spent in Google+ is 33 seconds &#8211; and daily active user has not even been fully disclosed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: growsmartbusiness.com @ 2013-04-06 07:36:56 --