Loading

Grow Smart Business


teaserInfographic
Close
For more information and charts about Small Business Mobile:
and See Key Highlights from the Web.com Small Business Mobile Survey
homepreneur

Search Articles



Venture Capital Articles


Where Are VCs Investing Now?

February 14th, 2012 ::

By Karen Axelton

Facebook’s recent IPO may be getting all the attention, but social media isn’t the only area where investors are putting their money. When it comes to venture capitalists, Information Week reports, VCs’ favorite place to invest in 2011 was the health IT sector. Specifically, medical software and information services attracted $633 million in VC investment in 2011–the most this sector has attracted since 2001, according to data from Dow Jones VentureSource.

DowJones data shows VC investment in health IT rose from $394 million in 2009 to $520 million in 2010. 2011 saw a 22 percent increase in dollars invested, along with a 26 percent increase in the total number of deals–from 68 in 2010 to 86 in 2011.

What’s behind the surge of interest in healthcare IT? The last three years have seen wider adoption of electronic health records, accelerated by President Obama’s federan incentives. And consumers’ and healthcare practitioners’ growing comfort with using the Internet, software and mobile devices to store, access and manage health-related data has attracted VCs’ attention.

And their interest in the health IT sector shows no sign of slowing, according to the most recent Venture View survey by Dow Jones VentureSource and the National Venture Capital Association. The poll of more than 500 venture capitalists in late 2011 found 61 percent predict investment in healthcare IT will rise in 2012.

While health IT is a rising star of healthcare VC investments, biopharmaceuticals was still the healthcare industry that got the most VC investment in 2011, with 302 deals at a total of $3.9 billion. However, compared to 2010, that figure represents a 6 percent decline in deals and flat dollar investment.

Medical devices came in second, with 290 deals in 2011 for a total of $3.3 billion. Although the number of deals declined slightly, investment dollars rose by more than 25 percent.

Where are VCs not investing? Perhaps due to uncertainty as to how healthcare reform will actually shake out, investment in healthcare services plummeted from $1.2 billion in 2010 to $541 million in 2011.

Overall, the Dow Jones VentureSource quarterly survey of VC investments in energy, consumer Web and IT, health, and electronics and computer hardware companies showed that total VC investments slowed in the last quarter of 2011, the year overall saw 3,209 deals for a total of $32.6 billion. That’s a 10 percent increase in capital raised and a 6 percent increase in the number of deals compared to 2010.

Image by Flickr user takomabibelot (Creative Commons)

2011: A Good—and Bad—Year for Venture Capital

January 24th, 2012 ::

By Maria Valdez Haubrich

The fourth quarter 2011 data from the National Venture Capital Association is in and there is good news and bad news about the venture capital industry.

The good news is that the amount of money venture capital firms are investing is on the rise; the bad news is that the number of venture capital funds out there is declining. In the U.S., 38 venture capital funds raised a total of $5.6 billion in the fourth quarter of 2011, representing a dollar increase of 162 percent but a 41 percent drop in the number of funds compared to the third quarter of 2011. (In that quarter, 64 funds raised $2.1 billion.) This quarter marked the lowest number of funds raising money since the third quarter of 2009.

In all of 2011, U.S. venture capital fundraising totaled $18.17 billion from 169 funds. That’s a 32 percent increase by dollars compared to 2010, but the same number of funds.

“This past year we saw more venture capital money raised by essentially the same number of firms, a sign that consolidation within the industry is continuing,” said Mark Heesen, president of NVCA, in announcing the data. “We also continued to invest more money in companies than we raised from our investors. Both of these trends – if they continue — suggest that the level and breadth of venture investment is starting to recalibrate to reflect a concentration of capital in the hands of fewer investors. Our cottage industry is indeed getting smaller still and that will impact the startup ecosystem over time.”

How will this shakeout affect small businesses? Consolidation in financial industries generally makes it harder for smaller companies to get backing, as bigger funds with more dollars to invest are more likely to look for high returns and less likely to take risks on smaller firms without a high potential for ROI.

At the same time, a shakeout is also occurring in the IPO market. The NVCA recently reported that in 2011, 52 venture-backed companies went public, representing a value of $9.9 billion. That’s a 31 percent decrease in volume, but a 41 percent increase in dollar value compared to the previous year.

In other words, with both venture capital investment and venture-backed IPOs, the trend is toward fewer and bigger players, meaning bigger—but fewer—deals.

Image by Flickr user photosteve101 (Creative Commons)

Small Biz Resource Tip: ChubbyBrain

November 24th, 2011 ::

ChubbyBrain

If you’re looking for funding for your business, you want to find a good fit with a lender. ChubbyBrain can help. ChubbyBrain is a funding recommendation engine that analyzes the funding history of venture capitalists, angel investors, financial institutions and grant providers to find those that best fit your business’s needs. It only takes about 5 minutes to input your business’s data; then the search engine uses your data to find your match. Best of all, it’s free. In addition to the search engine, ChubbyBrain offers guides to help small business owners navigate the world of getting financing.

 

New Financing Option for Small Businesses: SBIC Impact Investment Initiative Launches

August 18th, 2011 ::

By Karen Axelton

Small businesses seeking capital in Michigan have a new source of options thanks to the Small Business Administration. The SBA last month announced that InvestMichigan! Mezzanine Fund will be the first licensed Impact Investment Fund in the SBA’s new Impact Investment Initiative. The $130 million venture capital fund will provide capital to businesses that are headquartered in Michigan, have a significant presence in Michigan or are in the process of expanding their operations in Michigan so they can grow and create jobs.

The InvestMichigan! fund is the first stage in a $1 billion commitment over five years through the SBA’s Impact Investment funds, part of the Obama administration’s Startup America initiative announced in January. Karen Mills, SBA Administrator, said Michigan was chosen as the launch state because of its economic struggles as well as opportunities.

Startup America is a White House initiative to bring together public and private organizations to help entrepreneurs. It will use the infrastructure of the SBA’s Small Business Investment Company Program (SBIC), which supplements private equity capital and long-term loan funds to help small businesses expand. In FY 2010, according to SBA data, the SBIC program provided $1.59 billion of financing to nearly 900 U.S. small businesses.

The Impact Investment Initiative is expected to put up to $1.5 billion into the hands of small businesses over the next five years. It will combine public and private funding for high-growth companies that generate not only a financial but also a “social” return. The program will focus on businesses in underserved markets or in sectors that have been defined as national priorities. Impact investments can be:

  • Place-based, targeting small businesses located in or employing residents of low or moderate income areas or economically distressed areas; or
  • Sector-based, targeting industry sectors that the Administration has identified as national priorities. (Currently only clean energy and education have been identified as priority sectors.)

The SBA will collaborate with private, institutional investors to identify impact investments and provide licensing and capital to fund managers who qualify to organize and operate an Impact Investment SBIC.

For more information on the Impact Investment Initiative, visit the SBA website.

Image by Flickr user TexasGOPVote (Creative Commons)

 

Corporate VC Makes a Comeback

May 31st, 2011 ::

By Karen Axelton

Capital for small businesses has been hard to come by for the past few years, and venture capital has been especially so. But now a particular kind of VC—venture capital from corporations—may be making a comeback.

Writing in VentureBeat, venture capitalist Robert R. Ackerman, Jr., contends, “Corporations are seeing the light and reinvesting in venture capital” after a few dry years.

Ackerman cites some impressive figures. In 2010 corporations invested $1.9 billion in venture capital in the United States. That represents an increase of 33 percent from 2009 figures, and accounted for almost 9 percent of all VC investing in 2010, which Ackerman says is close to a record. In fact, he notes, last year corporate venture capitalists invested in 20 percent of all venture capital deals.

General Motors, Google, BMW and Verizon Communications are just some of the corporations getting involved in venture capital today.

Why are corporations suddenly getting back into VC? The answer has to do with small business. Corporations are recognizing small businesses as key drivers of innovation, and realize that small businesses are more efficient at using VC investments than are bigger ones.

The last big surge in corporate VC was during the dotcom boom of 1999-2000, Ackerman says. But this time around there are some important differences. Corporations are being more cautious with their investments, and small businesses are being more careful with the money.  Both are good news for avoiding a repeat of the dotcom bubble and its subsequent bursting.

Ackerman notes that the fit between corporations and the small business recipients of their capital investments isn’t always perfect. Corporations are slow-moving, anxious for fast results, and suffer from rapid turnover at the top, all of which can frustrate a small company’s management team.

But for small businesses seeking an answer to their capital problems, the influx of more options for finding investors can only be a good thing in the long run.

Image by Flickr user Futurilla (Creative Commons)

Small Biz Resource Tip

April 27th, 2011 ::

Springboard 2011

If you’re a women-led business in a high-growth industry looking for investment to propel your business to the next level, you’ll want to bookmark the Springboard: Venture Forum 2011. Springboard is a nonprofit organization whose platform is designed to help promote, showcase and connect investment-ready women-led business with investors, experts and other entrepreneurs. Right now through May 2, Springboard is looking for women-led companies at all stages of business growth to apply for the 2011 venture forum program. The program consists of a four-month relationship building and business assessment program including interviews, a business boot and investor presentment opportunity. Check the site for application qualifications.

Small Biz Resource Tip: Angelsoft.net

January 6th, 2011 ::

 

Angelsoft.net

If you’re looking for a way to reach venture capitalists and angel investor groups, check out Angelsoft.net’s detailed list of investors. Angelsoft.net provides access to 588 angel groups, VCs and funds, plus over 29,000 investors. Search by the amount of funding you’re seeking, the kind of businesses the investors are interested in, and even the terms the firms usually offer. Angelsoft then manages the deal for the investors, help entrepreneurs with their business plans and more. Prices range from free to $250 a month. Entrepreneurs are limited to three applications at one time.

Will New Regulations Clip Super Angels’ Wings?

December 23rd, 2010 ::

By Karen Axelton

Have you heard of “super angels”? While regular angel investors put money into small businesses individually or in groups, super angels also manage other people’s investments in startups. In recent years, super angels have become a more important source of financing for small businesses as traditional capital sources have dried up.

But the Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed new financial regulations that could hamper super angels, VentureBeat reports—and that would be bad news for small businesses.

The proposed new regulations would require venture capital funds to be subject to public information reporting requirements for the first time. While experts cited by VentureBeat say this change wouldn’t have a detrimental effect on overall VC financing, it would hurt super angels—currently the fastest growing part of the VC industry.

Super angels typically run very lean and mean with a tiny staff; in fact, many outsource their back office functions altogether. Because the proposed reporting requirements will require compiling and maintaining lots of additional data, super angels would most likely have to revise their back offices and add staff, boosting their administrative overhead.

However, if the proposed rules are adopted in their current form, most traditional VC funds would be exempt based on the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The good news: The SEC is seeking commentary from the public to ensure that any proposed regulation conforms as closely as possible with the standard industry standard practices that currently exist. This may be a sign that the commission will seek not to disrupt the effectiveness of super angel investors.

You can learn more about the proposed rules and how to submit comments at the SEC website.

Small Biz Resource Tip: VentureBeat

December 1st, 2010 ::

VentureBeat

Founded and created by a venture capital journalist, VentureBeat’s mission is “to provide news about innovation for forward-thinking executives.” The site, which has been honored by The New York Times as one of the best blogs out there, covers news and information related to the venture capital industry. The site is organized by news topic and beats, include mobile technology, social networking, environmental issues and who’s getting what deal with whom. Sign up for e-newsletters and visit the Entrepreneur’s Corner for information targeted to business owners. You can also tune in to interesting webinars on such topics as Cloud Computing.

Sweat Equity and Broke

June 30th, 2010 ::

Over the last 10 years as an entrepreneur I have taken many risks and some have panned out and well others…let’s just say that I should have looked before I leaped. Then again, that is one of the truest traits of an entrepreneur, taking risk and making something from nothing.

Recently, I was reading an article called “The Sweat Equity Myth” by George Cloutier, Founder of American Management Systems. In his article he talks about the concept of “sweat equity”:

“The idea that business owners shouldn’t pay themselves a salary while they’re building a business. I call it working for nothing and being a fool.”

I couldn’t agree more with him, because I have done it and it was one of the worst things I ever did. When I started my first business, things were great and we had tons of clients. Sure it was the dotcom boom but we thought it was a whole new world. So when the sky fell and the bubble burst, many clients went out of business so we had to tighten the belt. Instead of swallowing my pride and lay people off I sacrificed my own salary and cut it in half as a message of solidarity, or so I rationalized to myself.

He goes on to mention something that I should have noticed early on, but didn’t:

“The inability to pay yourself is symptomatic of a much deeper financial problem; it’s should serve as a red flag that your business is not working. Lack of sales or quality control, bloated overhead and other financial woes are the real reasons you’re not making a salary.”

When 9/11 happened the clients we did have froze their contracts and put any new business in pipeline on hold for six months or more. My business, like many others, had a “deer in the headlights” look and many collapsed quickly. We did have some cash reserves so we had to make a decision, go on and try our luck or shut almost everything down to fight another day. We chose the later but paying everyone’s severance left me with nothing and extra debt to boot.

Over time, I did recover from that but in another business made the same mistake thinking that it was noble of me to sacrifice my sweat for equity I already had in the first place. Bottom line: Pay yourself first.

I would like to expand on that by including George’s tip to avoid this easy entrepreneurial trap:

  • Always work to make a good salary. Then cover the expenses. Not the other way around.
  • Reward yourself (but within reason). Here’s a rough formula: Pay yourself 3 to 4 cents on each dollar of revenue for doing the job of CEO.
  • Imagine you weren’t in the picture. Ask yourself how much you’d pay a general manager to run your business if you had to go away. That’s the least you should be paying yourself.
  • Remember your priorities. Don’t lose sight of why you’re running a business in the first place–to improve your quality of life.
  • Spread pay cuts around. Take a 5 percent cut along with the rest of your staff, but don’t put a 30 percent pay cut on your own back.
  • Ask yourself this question: If your business doesn’t allow you to pay yourself a living wage, what are you doing wrong?
  • Remember: There are no rich martyrs.

So what will you decide when this moment occurs in your entrepreneurial journey?

Enhanced by Zemanta